Talk:Žumberak Mountains

Moving
Moved this back because 'Ž' isn't in ISO-8859-1. Morwen 12:12, May 21, 2004 (UTC)

If the Slovenians call it Gorjanci more often than Žumberak, perhaps we should move it altogether? IIRC, a bit more of the mountain is in Slovenia than it is in Croatia. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93;   20:39, 18 Dec 2004 (UTC)


 * I went ahead and moved it to a compromise title, seeing how the names are really equivalent. I kept &#381;umberak in the first place primarily for backwards compatibility. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93;   14:59, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)

No problem. If I recall correctly, IIRC stay for If I recall correctly :)? --andrejj 15:32, 19 Mar 2005 (UTC)


 * Yes :) --Joy &#91;shallot&#93;

I think that actual name of mountain is Žumbera&#269;ka gora not Žumberak (according to my map)?

It is aj ;) --andrejj 20:04, 3 May 2005 (UTC)


 * I think that's used interchangeably. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93;   20:32, 3 May 2005 (UTC)

Žumberačka gora
This should be on Žumberačka gora/Gorjanci? What about splitting on two articles Žumberačka gora and Gorjanci? --AndrejJ (talk) 05:53, 17 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Why should we split? Is this not the same geographic entity? --Eleassar my talk 09:01, 18 September 2008 (UTC)

German name
It is irrelevant IMHO. After all Zagreb was Zágráb, Agram or Zagrabia in history, but none of them mentioned ;-) --AndrejJ (talk) 05:36, 21 September 2009 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page moved. Rifleman 82 (talk) 22:53, 4 December 2010 (UTC)

Žumberak/Gorjanci → Žumberak — Per WP:Naming conventions (landforms). The name Žumberak is simply more prevalent in English sources.,, Eleassar my talk 09:09, 4 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Mild support - it's not really ideal, as the usage is not overwhelmingly one or the other - both seem to be common in English. However, the present article title does not meet naming conventions (just as we don't have an article called Colour/Color, so we shouldn't have a slashed title here either). So we may as well go with the slightly more used name, but making sure all else is neutral - in Slovenian articles refer to it as Gorjanci, in Croatian as Žumberak and make sure both titles are mentioned in the lede. &mdash; Amakuru (talk) 12:14, 4 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Oppose. I just don't see a compelling argument. The cited guideline does not actually proscribe the current solution and I don't see anyone complaining about the ordering (asking to put Gorjanci first). A general Google search for English-only results for "Zumberak -Gorjanci" and then one for "Gorjanci -Zumberak" is inconclusive. A Google Books search - ditto. Just leave it be unless someone actually has a real argument against the current title form. --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 12:24, 4 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Support. Get rid of the slash for aesthetic and naming convention reasons.  Either name is fine with me.  —   AjaxSmack   17:09, 6 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Support, per Alex. This sort of situation arises with many articles, and Wikipedia's solution is to pick just one of the names as the article title. I don't see any reason to do differently here.--Kotniski (talk) 14:20, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Who's Alex? Jafeluv (talk) 17:42, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Good question (another one for Gompie to ask, perhaps?) Sorry, per Ajax (and others).--Kotniski (talk) 21:05, 12 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Support move to either Žumberak or Gorjanci. It's an unfortunate situation when we have to choose between two common variants of a name, but I don't think trying to use both names is a solution. As Amakuru said above, we should pick one form as the article title (ideally the one that's most common in English), make a redirect from the other name, and encourage editors to use the correct variant in different contexts. Jafeluv (talk) 17:42, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Requested move 20 May 2015

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: page moved  Kharkiv07  ( T ) 14:05, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

Žumberak → Žumberak Highlands – Per WP:ENGLISH: this is an established English name of the entire highlands, Žumberak being only a part of it. Eleassar my talk 23:00, 20 May 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified (January 2018)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Žumberak Mountains. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090615214451/http://www.javno.com/en-croatia/slovenia-is-occupying-croatian-land-in-sveta-gera_236361 to http://www.javno.com/en-croatia/slovenia-is-occupying-croatian-land-in-sveta-gera_236361

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:44, 23 January 2018 (UTC)