Talk:...Ready for It?

Requested move 13 September 2017

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: not moved; snowball clause. (non-admin closure) Chase (talk &#124; contributions) 01:29, 17 September 2017 (UTC)

...Ready for It? → ...Ready For It? – The word "for" also capitalize based on YouTube and iTunes. Hddty. (talk) 14:12, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:25, 13 September 2017 (UTC)


 * Not by Wikipedia rules. And should the initial dots be in the Wikipedia standard name? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 16:25, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose per MOS:CT. – electric  Controller  16:58, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose: As above. Rarity dash  ( talk ) 17:33, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose: As above.  Aleccat  19:57, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose per the capitalization standards at MOS:CT Snuggums (talk / edits) 00:17, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose As above. As for the inital dots, I disagree, since "Make Me...", "...Baby One More Time", ...But Seriously and ...And Justice for All articles also have dots in its titles. Music01 (talk) 11:57, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose the word "for" is not capitalised. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.154.191.1 (talk) 12:24, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose: Grammatically, "for" is a preposition and should be made lowercase. The word "like" in "Someone like You (Adele song)" is capitalized on iTunes but should be lowercase, technically. CB19 (talk) 22:01, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Oppose per MOS:CT. Darkday (talk) 17:56, 15 September 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Is Genius a credible source?
I'd like to add more analysis of the song's lyrics into the "writing and composition" section, and so I found out about a website that analyses songs, and it's genius.com. I'd like to ask - is the website a credible source? Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 04:55, 22 November 2017 (UTC)


 * Genius is not credible, sorry. It's user-added content.  Aleccat  11:41, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Start-class?
I think this article can pass as C-class now. What do yall think? Nahnah4 (talk | contribs | guestbook) 06:49, 14 March 2018 (UTC)

Yes it can DontBlameMe (talk) 16:39, 28 April 2018 (UTC)

Key
"The song is performed in the key of E minor with a tempo of 160 beats per minute, with Swift's vocals spanning from G3 to E5."

The reference is to SongBPM. As I look, it gives the tempo but none of the other info in that sentence. So where has the rest of the info come from? Furthermore, according to my analysis the song is in a mixture of E minor and G major. — Smjg (talk) 15:13, 18 August 2019 (UTC)
 * See this reference, and then scroll to "Product Information". There, the key and the vocal range is available. Hanif Al Husaini (talk) 04:32, 3 September 2020 (UTC)

Cool Natnat6002 (talk) 20:52, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Release date
Hi! I found out that before the release on the US radio this song was sent on Russian contemporary hit radio as single on september 11 2017. Should I change the release date to September 11? Source: https://tophit.ru/en/tracks/84043/ MemberDecember (talk) 15:27, 15 October 2021 (UTC)