Talk:.222 Remington Magnum

65,000 PSI is wrong
65,000 psi is wrong Clarkmag (talk) 13:27, 21 September 2010 (UTC) Clarkmag
 * I fixed it. AliveFreeHappy (talk) 17:08, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


 * http://www.accuratepowder.com/data/PerCaliber2Guide/Rifle/Standarddata(Rifle)/22Cal(5.56mm)/222%20Remington%20Magnum%20pages%20183%20and%20184.pdf
 * In .222 Remington Magnum on 2011-05-20 21:28:36, 404 Not Found
 * In .222 Remington Magnum on 2011-05-31 04:43:50, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 04:44, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 2
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


 * http://data.hodgdon.com/catridge_load.asp
 * In .222 Remington Magnum on 2011-05-20 21:28:35, 404 Not Found
 * In .222 Remington Magnum on 2011-05-31 04:44:10, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 04:44, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Wrong availability data
The statement "... but currently (2007) there are no commercial manufacturers either of rifles or ammunition in .222 Rem. Mag. other than Cooper Firearms of Montana" is wrong. The cartridge is currently manufactured by Sako of Finland

Minewarrior (talk) 20:46, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

"