Talk:.358 Winchester

.358 Win more powerful than .348 Win?
"It created a round more powerful than the .35 Remington and .348 Winchester." Is this really true? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.82.166.72 (talk) 05:13, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


 * http://www.winchester.com/products/catalog/cfrdetail.aspx?symbol=X3581&cart=MzU4IFdpbmNoZXN0ZXI=
 * In .358 Winchester on 2011-05-20 21:37:04, 404 Not Found
 * In .358 Winchester on 2011-05-31 12:44:22, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 12:44, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 2
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


 * http://www.chuckhawks.com/subscribers/rifle_cartridge_page/358Win.htm
 * In .358 Winchester on 2011-05-20 21:37:04, 401 Authorization Required
 * In .358 Winchester on 2011-05-31 12:44:32, 401 Authorization Required

--JeffGBot (talk) 12:45, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 3
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


 * http://www.accuratepowder.com/data/PerCaliber2Guide/Rifle/Standarddata(Rifle)/358Cal(9.09mm)/358%20Winchester%20pages%20310%20311.pdf
 * In .358 Winchester on 2011-05-20 21:37:04, 404 Not Found
 * In .358 Winchester on 2011-05-31 12:45:07, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 12:45, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

The .358 was first.
The 35 Whelen was not a factory round at the time of the arrival of the .358 w.

also, the .358 has been discontinued by the major ammo companies.

please correct — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.20.178.16 (talk) 22:12, 28 December 2011 (UTC)