Talk:.480 Ruger

January 2010
Wrote to Midway asking for permission to use one of their images. Kartano (talk) 23:42, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Permission was denied to use this image. Kartano (talk) 00:42, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

March 2010
Wrote to the GunBlast website asking for permission to use their image of the .480 Ruger. Kartano (talk) 00:42, 17 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Done - image added, permissions forwarded on to OTRS. Kartano (talk) 01:54, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Citation Needed Correction
The request for citation at the end of the following sentence should not be necessary, as the comment is not claiming a specific fact and provides popular culture reference which is reasonable to believe (it's not hard to imagine internet forums buzzing about a new product within an industry).

"Magazine articles and online forums were, for a brief while, replete with discussion about the potential of the cartridge." - Under USAGE Gregrium (talk) 21:40, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Outdated Information
This section is outdated and needs to be rewritten: "There were many handgunners that disliked the heavy Super Redhawk, and waited for Ruger to release the cartridge in their Super Blackhawk single-action. This never came to pass, so many potential buyers chose to just pass on the cartridge." Ruger now has a Super Blackhawk in 480 Ruger. DrHenley (talk) 02:04, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Update (Dec. 2015)
A picture of the 480 Ruger needs to be added to the page, possible a comparison to other magnum class calibers picture should be added as well.

There is a Lot of POV in this Article
This seems to be a particularly pervasive problem in the handgun section, but there is a lot of POV writing in this article. Syr74 (talk) 01:39, 17 March 2018 (UTC)