Talk:.info/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Czarkoff (talk · contribs) 18:42, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

The article meets the quick-fail criteria: two citation needed tags are in place since July 2009. I put this review on hold for 3 days (until 19:00, 13 February 2012 (UTC)) to see if this issue will be addressed. If the citation would be provided, the actual review will be performed; otherwise the nomination will fail. &mdash; Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 18:42, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I've added a citation, and removed one sentence because I couldn't find a citation. oyasumi (talk) 19:12, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
 * OK, passing to review. &mdash; Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk) 23:58, 11 February 2012 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

The article has a long way to go before it can become GA.
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * The lead was supposed to summarize article; in this article it used as an unnamed section instead. As significant textual changes are required to address this problem, the prose was not checked. Still I would note, that link to Sunrise Challenge Policy (SCP) in the infobox leads to an unrelated page. The references are malformatted, use citation templates to make references satisfy WP:MOS.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * The article is virtually unreferenced; I'll tag statements that has to be referenced. As of the URL of reference 3 leads to location change.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Talk page contains a referenced information about the usage of .info domains for spam purposes; why doesn't article reflect it?
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail: