Talk:1/7 (number)

Comments
Something needs to be done. I think the most logical approach is to merge the remaining line into 7 (number), but outright deletion is not absurd. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 04:46, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
 * I agree.  M C  10  |  Sign here!  05:35, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Oppose. It is true, 1/7 is the reciprocal of 7, but then 142857 clearly has a lot of other properties that 7 doesn't have. --121.7.203.64 (talk) 03:12, 30 May 2009 (UTC)

Oppose - These are entirely different numbers. Cheers! Scapler (talk) 02:12, 9 June 2009 (UTC)

It's been redirected to 142857, which I consider an acceptable result, although a bit confusing. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 02:16, 9 June 2009 (UTC)