Talk:1000 Forms of Fear/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Calvin999 (talk · contribs) 18:52, 3 March 2015 (UTC)


 * General
 * Some problematic links here
 * All ✅ — HĐ (talk) 13:27, 14 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Lead
 * Each of the three paragraphs in the lead starts with 1000 Forms of Fear'. Try to use other ways like "It" or "The album", too.


 * 1000 Forms of Fear also incorporates → It also incorporates


 * songwriting skill as well as the album's lyrical content → Is this kind of one and the same?


 * Remove repetition of "atop" in two successive sentences. "charted" / "peaked" ?


 * The lead feels slightly sparse. How about some promotional performances being included? Awards won for the album and how "Chandelier" was Grammy Nominated.


 * was made available in January 2015.→ Slightly ambiguous as to what is it available for.


 * Background
 * managed to start a career → and established a career


 * Any info as to why she decided to go back to singing? First paragraphs says she retired, second says she recorded vocals for a possible new album. There's no in-between.
 * Actually it has already been mentioned. Sia signed to RCA Records with the release of the album as a contractual obligation.
 * Ah okay. I was getting a bit confused. —  ₳aron  09:25, 16 March 2015 (UTC)


 * Singles
 * There's lots of repetition of "the single". Five times in the first paragraph alone.


 * Promotion
 * Sia recruited Maddie Ziegler → Sia recruited Ziegler


 * Kirsten Wiig is also an actress (arguably better known as)


 * Critical reception
 * It's quite quotey, try to paraphrase some of the quotes so it doesn't read like a list as quotes.
 * I tried the best as I could.


 * Certifications
 * You can include United States and write 177,000, just leave the certification blank.
 * It will, in my opinion, look not really nice. HĐ (talk) 05:45, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Most articles include it, because it's a sales and certifications table, not just certifications. —  ₳aron  09:25, 16 March 2015 (UTC)


 * References
 * Some of the work parameters in the references are not linked the very first time, perhaps one or two after. Such as Billboard being linked in ref 5 but not ref 3.


 * NY Times in ref 4 needs linking (it's linked in 12)


 * 56 for example is missing Billboard
 * Just go through the refs and check them again.

Thanks for your patience. Short but sweet article. On hold for 7 days days. I have over 2,300 articles on my watch list so ping me when you need me. — ₳aron  14:20, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Outcome
 * I have addressed all of your concerns. Thanks for your review, HĐ (talk) 05:45, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
 * All ✅
 * Well done. Passing. —  ₳aron  10:52, 16 March 2015 (UTC)