Talk:100th United States Congress

Untitled
There is a competing standard on how to title these articles. Should we use the words (One Hundredth) or the numbers (100th)? Chadlupkes 18:35, 26 December 2005 (UTC)


 * I say numbers. All the .gov sites I saw refer to it as the "100th Government." Bsd987 01:33, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
 * I agree and am going to be bold. No reason to have 2. -Jcbarr 04:57, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
 * So how come #1-99 are all spelled out? *Dan T.* 15:41, 10 March 2006 (UTC)
 * For the sake of consistency, and the fact that it'll take forever to change 1-99, let's have them spelled out in the article summaries while keeping the page names numeric. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Qwayzer (talk • contribs) 23:51, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 100th United States Congress. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060601025644/http://www.gpoaccess.gov/serialset/cdocuments/hd108-222/index.html to http://www.gpoaccess.gov/serialset/cdocuments/hd108-222/index.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060601013451/http://clerk.house.gov/histHigh/Congressional_History/index.html to http://clerk.house.gov/histHigh/Congressional_History/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 21:01, 13 June 2017 (UTC)