Talk:10121 Arzamas

Notability tag
Im starting a discussion on its notability, to establish if it should be redirected or kept. Alerting (who tagged it for notability),  (creator),  who once prodded it and  who removed prod. Any inpu would be very welcome. Boleyn (talk) 11:01, 6 January 2016 (UTC)


 * 2 weeks after 's post (2 days from now) seems like a reasonable time to wait for notability info to be stated in the article, especially after 's response regarding MBAs numbered > 10,000. I'll #redirect after that time.  ~ Tom.Reding (talk ⋅dgaf)  20:48, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

That seems reasonable. Boleyn (talk) 22:10, 18 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The most notable thing that I can find about 10121 Arzamas is that the provisional designation has BS in it and it makes meaningless BS close approaches to Jupiter. Beavis and Butt-Head might want to keep it. -- Kheider (talk) 03:53, 19 January 2016 (UTC)

I did a re-write on 10121 Arzamas, based on the available information I found. Speaking of "BS", I have now dealt with these kind of articles for six months in a row, maybe it's time we start a serious conversation to clear things up? I'm ready for it, anytime, anywhere, for as long as it takes. Cheers,  R fassbind  – talk   13:32, 2 March 2016 (UTC)