Talk:102nd Division (Philippines)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Auntieruth55 (talk · contribs) 17:59, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Hi, I'll be reviewing this article in the next day or two. auntieruth (talk) 17:59, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Criteria
 Good Article Status - Review Criteria   		A good article is&mdash;  :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

:
 * (a) ;
 * (b) ;
 * (c) ; and
 * (d).

:
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).

. . :
 * (a) ; and
 * (b).



Review
 <li>:</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>:</li>

<li>.</li>

<li>.</li> <li>:</li>

</ol>

Discussion

 * I mentioned Morse in the 'Organization' section. Could you kindly point out some of the sentences that you find problematic? Kges1901 (talk) 20:54, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I see it now. first sentence of Japanese invasion is confusing.  Maybe break into two?  auntieruth (talk) 16:23, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
 * I have reduced the size of the sentence, I don't think that the report itself matters. Kges1901 (talk) 17:00, 11 May 2018 (UTC)


 * The Japanese perspective has been covered since the US official history I used as a source incorporated material gained from Japanese documents after the end of the war. Kges1901 (talk) 21:27, 12 May 2018 (UTC)