Talk:102nd Intelligence Wing/GA2

This review is transcluded from Talk:102nd Intelligence Wing/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Content
The Global War on Terror section needs to be overhauled. What exactly did they do during the 9/11 attacks? I suggest deleting the part about the number of sorties they flew in 2001 except that was a direct consequence of the attacks and before they didn't fly sorties or not on that scale.
 * I fixed the section. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 01:22, 19 July 2008 (UTC)
 * I sent you a message about a sentence that lacks grammar and sense. I wonder about Flight 175 hitting the second tower at 9:03. You should also point out why the fighters didn't intercept that one. Wandalstouring (talk) 13:26, 19 July 2008 (UTC)

MoS
I have doubts whether the use of fat letters is in accordance with MoS. Will have to ask an expert about it. Otherwise the article is GA quality and I suggest an A-class review after the content issue has been solved. Wandalstouring (talk) 13:06, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

Heads Up
I want all reviewers to know that the following issue has been discussed and agreed upon: *References-I also can't seem to combine all references as some say that they are invalid, so someone who is good at this will have my praise if they can do so. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 17:50, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Title-Some people think that it should have "(United States)" after it, but it has been decided since that the USAF is the only one with the naming system, it really would just restate the obvious. It should also be noted that many people don't like that ending on USAF articles anyways. If you want to see the discussion, go here: User_talk:Ktr101/Archive_1 Kevin Rutherford (talk) 23:21, 27 June 2008 (UTC)