Talk:109 Piscium

Temporary page
I have created a temporary replacement page at 109 Piscium/Temp. Chaos syndrome 23:07, 19 April 2006 (UTC)


 * Said page does not exist anymore. Ian Manka Talk to me! 06:31, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Copyright problems
In this edit, material copied from the website SolStation was added to the article. Since SolStation is copyrighted, I reverted the article to the version before the copyrighted material was added, per WP:CP. Icalanise (talk) 14:11, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 109 Piscium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.iop.org/EJ/article/0004-637X/536/2/902/50799.html
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160402233353/http://www.aanda.org/index.php?option=com_article&access=bibcode&Itemid=129&bibcode=2007A&A...474..653VFUL to http://www.aanda.org/index.php?option=com_article&access=bibcode&Itemid=129&bibcode=2007A%26A...474..653VFUL

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 22:00, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

Spectral Type
I think that the spectral type of this star should be G3IV-V or G3IV. G3V seems too dim for this star as it seems to be a subgiant which was originated from a F9 or G0 main sequence star. Also, the article states that one source classified 109 Psc as a subgiant. Should I change it to G3IV? 2003 LN6 (talk) 16:00, 21 October 2022 (UTC)