Talk:10 Hygiea/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Hi, I will be reviewing your article for GA. Initially, it looks very good. I will be making some comments. &mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 00:50, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Are you using a consistent reference format?
 * What exactly do you mean? All the refs are cite journal and cite web with one exception Nergaal (talk) 02:31, 7 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Could you link perihelion in the text? (I noticed later that you have it linked in the template.)
 * "This is much more than for the other objects in the "big four", the dwarf planet Ceres and the asteroids 2 Pallas and 4 Vesta." - needs a colon rather than a semicolon if you mean that the "big four" are the following bodies listed.
 * "Aside from being the smallest of the four, another important factor to this end is Hygiea's..." - to what end?
 * There are statements in Orbit and rotation that are unreferenced.

How does it look now? Nergaal (talk) 03:42, 7 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Final GA review (see here for criteria)

&mdash; Mattisse (Talk) 19:06, 27 January 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail: