Talk:10 złotych note

Image copyright problem with File:10zl a.jpg
The image File:10zl a.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
 * That this article is linked to from the image description page.

The following images also have this problem:


 * File:10zl r.jpg

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --00:27, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Mmm...
... the article says "In 1950, new notes, which were dated 1948, were introduced for 2, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100 and 500 złotych, but 1000 złotych notes were added in 1962.[2] 200 and 2000 złotych notes were added in 1976 and 1977, followed by 5000 złotych notes in 1982" and it has a picture of the ten zloty note with Jozef Bem on it (that should be added and linked). But I'm pretty sure the Bem note was issued in the 1980's (probably 1982), not in 1950 as the article suggests.

More generally, I'm not so sure that this is a reliable source.Volunteer Marek (talk) 19:40, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

In fact, it's just an older version of Wikipedia.Volunteer Marek (talk) 19:40, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

But, instead of obliging another editor into doing it, you could have been WP:BOLD and fixed it, but with civility of course. – Plarem (User talk contribs) 18:29, 7 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Well, you nominated it for GA. I actually tried to find something about it but wasn't going to spend that much time on it. Volunteer Marek 18:51, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

B-class review for WP:POLAND
Failed, due to issues raised in the GA review which ended in total removal of several sections (design, security). Without them, the article cannot even claim to be roughly comprehensive. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; talk to me 22:54, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Changing złotych to zlotys: BRD
believes that we should spell złoty as "zloty" and create an unnatural plural "zlotys". I disagree, just as I would if we still had Italian Lire (not Liras!). The wp:common name is złotych. Until the RtM at Polish złoty is resolved, it is wp:disruptive to try to sneak the equivalent change through on related articles. Please stop. John Maynard Friedman (talk) 19:52, 17 September 2022 (UTC)


 * The National Bank of Poland uses "zlotys" on its English website, thus I did not think it controversial. TheCurrencyGuy (talk) 03:37, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Given that you made the change while the discussion at talk:Złoty was ongoing and clearly controversial, I'm afraid I have difficulty understanding your logic.
 * For as long as the title of the article is "10 złotych note", the content should use the same style (perhaps with a footnote explaining the Polish declension?). Conversely, I see no problem with you creating redirect articles 10 zlotys note and ten zlotys note. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 11:48, 18 September 2022 (UTC)