Talk:10th Baluch Regiment

Requested move
move DrKiernan (talk) 08:59, 17 February 2009 (UTC)

May I raise a question about the name of this? I accept that we sometimes need to use names invented after the event to distinguish (say) the modern Indian Army from the Indian Army (1895–1947) of British India, or in this case the Baloch Regiment of the old Indian Army from the Baloch Regiment of the Pakistan Army, but couldn't we use the more authentic name here of Baluch Regiment (Indian Army)? Regards, Xn4  ( talk ) 13:18, 2 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Having copyedited the text heavily, it's now clear that its just the 10th Baluch Regiment covered, so disambiguation is not needed, there only being one of these. I'll shift it along soon enough, assuming I don't need admin help.GraemeLeggett (talk) 14:00, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * It does actually need admin help, if you have no objections, I'll request the move.GraemeLeggett (talk) 14:02, 2 February 2009 (UTC)
 * You're right, 10th Baluch Regiment is even better. And I think perhaps Baluch Regiment should be a dab page instead of a redirect. Xn4  ( talk ) 14:47, 2 February 2009 (UTC)