Talk:1159 papal election/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * Have performed a minor copyedit to remove MoS. The lead need to be extended considerably, probably fivefold. Remember to mention all parts of the article; the lead is to summarize, not introduce, the article.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * The bibliography section should cite books within cite book. All-caps titles should be converted to lower caps—all caps is a matter of typography and not grammar or spelling. The first paragraph under "Death of Adrian IV" should be referenced. Ref 25 and 35 should be in the cite web template.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Placing on hold until the addressed matters have been seen to. If you have any questions or comments, feel free to express them here. Arsenikk (talk)  15:51, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Placing on hold until the addressed matters have been seen to. If you have any questions or comments, feel free to express them here. Arsenikk (talk)  15:51, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Placing on hold until the addressed matters have been seen to. If you have any questions or comments, feel free to express them here. Arsenikk (talk)  15:51, 16 October 2008 (UTC)

I think it's all done now. CarlosPn 22 Oct 2008 15:35 CET
 * Congratulations with a Good Article! Arsenikk (talk)  13:48, 22 October 2008 (UTC)