Talk:12th Central Committee of the Communist Party of Vietnam/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: FenrisAureus (talk · contribs) 07:35, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

Hello fellow traveller! I will be reviewing this nomination over the course of the next 14 days. If you have time, please consider reviewing an article at WP:GAN.— FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they)   ( talk ) 20:11, 23 December 2023 (UTC)

GA review
Last updated: (UTC) by

See what the criteria are and what they are not

1) Well-written


 * 1a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct


 * 1b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation

2) Verifiable with no original research


 * 2a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline


 * 2b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)


 * 2c) it contains no original research


 * {| class="wikitable"

! Reference # !! /❌ !!Comment
 * + 2a/2b/2c Combined spot check
 * }
 * }
 * }
 * }
 * }
 * }
 * }
 * }
 * }
 * }
 * }


 * 2d) it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism
 * All things flagged by Earwig seem to be false positives. — FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they)   ( talk ) 09:36, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

3) Broad in its coverage


 * 3a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic


 * 3b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)

4) Neutral:


 * 4) Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each

5) Stable:


 * 5) Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute

6) Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio
 * 6a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content


 * 6b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

Overall:

Comments:
Deepest apologies, fellow traveller. I have been trying but I just don't have the focus to review this article right now. Extenuating circumstances necessitate that I withdraw as reviewer. A bot will put the nomination back into the cue. — FenrisAureus ▲ (she/they)   ( talk ) 12:12, 3 January 2024 (UTC)