Talk:1387 (number)

Notability
I previously nominated this article (1387 (number)) for deletion, and it was pointed out that it should have been merged, instead. The merge has now been reversed. I don't think there's anything notable about the number which is not already in 1000 (number). Previous discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Mathematics. Comments? — Arthur Rubin (talk) 16:12, 1 September 2011 (UTC)


 * I would prefer redirecting it, not seeing any content worth saving. CRGreathouse (t | c) 16:21, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Agree. However, I think merge is the appropriate tag.  We don't have redirect to.  I think WP:BRD should have left it deleted, but with Gandalf's opinion that it should be a separate article, we need a discussion section.  — Arthur Rubin  (talk) 16:28, 1 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I think discussion is appropriate. CRGreathouse (t | c) 16:31, 1 September 2011 (UTC)


 * I think the properties quoted for this number means it just scrapes over the notability bar set by WP:NUMBER, so the article should be kept. However, I am happy to go with a consensus to delete or redirect if this is established after a reasonable opportunity for discussion. Gandalf61 (talk) 08:16, 2 September 2011 (UTC)
 * I think it's pretty far below the bar, but I am likewise happy to go with consensus. CRGreathouse (t | c) 04:57, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
 * No-one else seems to want to keep the article, so I withdraw my objection to redirect or deletion. Gandalf61 (talk) 07:59, 8 September 2011 (UTC)

So as the consensus went, I have merged it. extra 999 ( talk )  08:35, 7 March 2012 (UTC)