Talk:13 Assassins (2010 film)/GA2

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 18:43, 20 August 2017 (UTC)

This article is in good shape to become a GA but there are somethings I would like to improved if you ever plan to make it into a FA. Nevertheless, I think this would be nitpicking for GA review, so I'll pass. Great work.Tintor2 (talk) 18:43, 20 August 2017 (UTC)
 * This is still listed as a nominee because you have not completed the passing instructions. Before you do so, can you please provide some commentary on how this article meets the Good article criteria? Otherwise, I'm not sure how legitimate some jaded Wikipedians will see this as. Ribbet32 (talk) 03:21, 21 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Well, the prose seems to be in good shape after its copyedit. Most references are archived and are also reliable sources. Free images are available while the only nonfree image has a a good rationale. The only comments against it would be too nitpick as if this article was nominated to FA like the lead needing expansion such as why the critics liked the movie and Theatrical run using small paragraphs. Other than that, maybe the wikilinks in Date of ceremony could be removed.Tintor2 (talk) 14:16, 21 August 2017 (UTC)


 * If you really believe that the article has passed the GA review, you must do items 1 and 6 in the passing instructions, just like what Ribbet said. Slightlymad (talk) 14:30, 21 August 2017 (UTC)


 * Date is linked to the article about the awards held that year, wherever possible. Btw, I hope you don't mind, but I did those items aforementioned on your behalf; it seemed that you have problems with them. In any case, thank you for this review. I don't intend to submit it for a FAR, though as I don't feel it's comprehensive enough an article. Cheers, Slightlymad (talk) 15:28, 21 August 2017 (UTC)