Talk:1458 (number)

Untitled
surely 1 satisfies the sum multiplied by the reverse sum rule? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.108.234.182 (talk) 17:19, 6 July 2006 (UTC)


 * Well spotted, although both 1 and 0 would probably be considered trivial solutions to the problem. I'll add a note to the article anyway. — sjorford++ 17:49, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

divisor 378? 62.56.50.124 18:32, 26 March 2007 (UTC) (Pazzy)


 * fixed wrong divisors (where did 3,6,9,18,21,42,63,126,189,378,729 come from? Cormullion 18:28, 30 March 2007 (UTC)