Talk:148th Division (People's Republic of China)

Requested move 19 April 2022

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion. 

The result of the move request was: consensus not to move the page to the proposed title at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 10:05, 26 April 2022 (UTC)

148th Division (People's Republic of China) → 148th Division – WP:TWODAB primary per WP:SMALLDETAILS&#32;BilledMammal (talk) 02:33, 19 April 2022 (UTC)
 * This is a contested technical request (permalink). No such user (talk) 13:45, 19 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Oppose per WP:RECOGNIZABILITY. Nobody's going to guess which army this one belongs for. No such user (talk) 13:46, 19 April 2022 (UTC)


 * Oppose per NSU. Completely agree. Gonnym (talk) 23:35, 19 April 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
 * Oppose per NSU, per the other similar RM. The Chinese, Japanese and Germans all had a 148th Division that had a rifle/infantry role. WP:MILMOS is part of the MOS and provides guidance on this. Specifically, it states that pre-emptive disambiguation of similarly named formations is the way to go, and frankly, MILMOS has served Wikipedia well for a lot of years and I see no reason to walk it back. If enough editors disagree, then start a centralised conversation about it at the Village Pump, don't go move formation articles unilaterally or create RMs. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 09:56, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Oppose per NSU. Too generic. -- Necrothesp (talk) 12:40, 21 April 2022 (UTC)