Talk:152 mm howitzer M1943 (D-1)/GA1

GA Reassessment
This discussion is transcluded from Talk:152 mm howitzer M1943 (D-1)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the reassessment.

This article has been reviewed as part of WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. The article history has been updated to reflect this review.
 * It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * I have undertaken a copyedit to remove some grammar errors and the article is not too bad.


 * It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * Although I am still passing the article, the inline citation have two serious problems that will probably result in this article being delisted in the not too distant future. Firstly none of th book sources provide page numbers, which makes them largely useless in determining the factual accuracy of the articles and secondly the citations are placed at the end of sections, not next to the facts they are meant to corroborate.


 * It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * It is stable.
 * It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
 * Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * a Pass/Fail:

Regards, Jackyd101 (talk) 00:05, 14 July 2008 (UTC)