Talk:15th Battalion (Australia)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Anotherclown (talk · contribs) 01:46, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

Progression

 * Version of the article when originally reviewed:
 * Version of the article when review was closed:

Technical review

 * Citations: The Citation Check tool reveals no errors with reference consolidation (no action req'd).
 * Disambiguations: a few dab links :
 * Salient
 * Buna
 * Wau
 * Caloundra, Queensland (redirect page)
 * Caloundra (disambiguation)
 * Linkrot: external links check reveals one dead link :
 * The Forgotten First: The 1st Australian Division in the Great War and its Legacy (info) [army.gov.au]
 * Alt text: Images all have alt text (no action req'd).
 * Copyright violations: The Earwig Tool reveals no issues with copyright violations or close paraphrasing (no action req'd).
 * Duplicate links: on duplicate link:
 * Citizens Forces

Criteria

 * It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * I've done a copy edit.
 * A couple of technical MOS issues above.


 * It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * All major points cited using WP:RS.
 * "Chataway 1948, p. 130–132" should be presented with "pp" instead of "p" as its a page range.
 * No issues with OR.


 * It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * Most major points seem to be covered without going into undue detail.
 * Level of coverage seems appropriate.


 * It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * No issues here.


 * It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * No issues here.


 * It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b (Is illustrated with appropriate images):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):  d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain:
 * Images are PD and seem appropriate to the article.


 * Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * Just a couple of minor technical fixes req'd, otherwise good. Anotherclown (talk) 10:27, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for taking the time to review this. I think I've fixed all the issues identified above. Cheers, AustralianRupert (talk) 11:13, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Changes look fine. Passing now. Anotherclown (talk) 10:06, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Cheers, have a good one. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 10:22, 24 July 2013 (UTC)