Talk:160 mm Mortar M1943

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 160mm Mortar M1943. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070410064544/http://www.csees.net/?page=country_section&country_id=1&sec=8 to http://www.csees.net/?page=country_section&country_id=1&sec=8

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 05:25, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:22, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
 * 黎巴嫩真主黨旗.jpg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:37, 4 June 2020 (UTC)
 * 黎巴嫩真主黨之旗.jpg

Mix-up of 160mm mortar users?
There seems to be a mix-up of users of M1943 160mm mortar users, in particular India and Finland neither of which appear to have used Soviet 160mm mortars. India used 160mm Finnish Tampella mortar, apparently bought from Israel, reference 14 about India even specifically mentions this, and photos of Indian 160mm mortars show Finnish Tampella mortars (not Israeli Soltam M66). Finland also used the Tampella mortar, but made in Finland, as far as I know the Finns never used any other. The references to Jane's Infantry Weapons 2001-2002 are now dead links so cannot be checked. I suggest that India and Finland be removed from the list of M1943 users unless newer sources can be found that they did use them as available evidence suggests they didn’t. 151.177.73.209 (talk) 10:48, 7 May 2023 (UTC)