Talk:1692 Subbotina

Best way to handle this and several similar articles
So I was going over articles with the notability tag and found this article along with several others that have been listed as having notability issues since 2012. I would like community input as to whether these type of astronomical objects should have a stand-alone article on Wikipedia, or if a redirect to asteroid belt would be more appropriate. Here's a list of all similar articles, also tagged:

1726 Hoffmeister

1734 Zhongolovich

1747 Wright

1792 Reni

1795 Woltjer

1796 Riga

1936 Lugano

1970 Sumeria

2147 Kharadze

2152 Hannibal

2231 Durrell

2251 Tikhov

2331 Parvulesco

2346 Lilio

2370 van Altena

2382 Nonie

2405 Welch

2424 Tautenburg

2428 Kamenyar

2444 Lederle

2446 Lunacharsky

2455 Somville

2465 Wilson

2501 Lohja

2509 Chukotka

2527 Gregory

2659 Millis

2708 Burns

2715 Mielikki

2720 Pyotr Pervyj

2732 Witt

2762 Fowler

2772 Dugan

2778 Tangshan

2809 Vernadskijv 2810 Lev Tolstoj

2816 Pien

2852 Declercq

2864 Soderblom

2892 Filipenko

2952 Lilliputia

2973 Paola

3065 Sarahill

3090 Tjossem

3124 Kansas

3197 Weissman

3365 Recogne

3389 Sinzot

3526 Jeffbell

3542 Tanjiazhen

3566 Levitan

3579 Rockholt

3611 Dabu

3627 Sayers

3642 Frieden

3645 Fabini

3647 Dermott

3687 Dzus

3744 Horn-d'Arturo

3796 Lene

3829 Gunma

3886 Shcherbakovia

4082 Swann

4107 Rufino

4135 Svetlanov

4284 Kaho

4297 Eichhorn

4304 Geichenko

4390 Madreteresa

4396 Gressmann

4713 Steel

4719 Burnaby

4804 Pasteur

4944 Kozlovskij

4969 Lawrence

4997 Ksana

-War wizard90 (talk) 03:40, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * See WP:NASTRO. Is there an in-depth study about this specific asteroid, rather than just a line in a database? If not, it's probably not notable. A lot of these articles on minor asteroids have ended up being deleted or redirected recently for that reason. —David Eppstein (talk) 04:27, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * AHA! Thank you, I didn't know we had specific notability guidelines regarding astronomical objects. That means probably all of these articles would fail notability, but rather than nominate them all for AfD, it might be better to just boldly redirect them all to asteroid belt. Anyone see issues with that solution? -War wizard90 (talk) 04:32, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
 * I'd agree with deletion. The only reference used as an external link is a database, so I don't think that really established notability. Kingofaces43 (talk) 02:49, 1 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I'd recommend redirecting them per the guidelines in WP:NASTRO. Praemonitus (talk) 17:13, 10 April 2015 (UTC)
 * I agree with Praemonitus. -- Dan Griscom (talk) 00:08, 20 April 2015 (UTC)