Talk:17 (XXXTentacion album)

"Reception" section errors and inconsistencies
Since around yesterday, the "Reception" section for 17 and XXXTENTACION's other album, ?, have been inconsistent with most other albums' "Reception" sections on Wikipedia. Why is the review aggregate website "AOTY" being used? I've never heard of it before, and the only place it's being used is for XXXTENTACION albums. This is inconsistent with albums from other artists, which use Metacritic. If there is no Metacritic score for an album, then it does not need to be given an aggregate score on the Wikipedia page, especially from relatively unknown websites like "AOTY".

Another error I noticed is the use of music reviewer TheNeedleDrop's reviews. I thought the general Wikipedia rule was that his review scores are not allowed on Wikipedia pages. Why are they on XXXTENTACION's album pages, but not any other artists'? These changes have only happened in the last couple of days, but make no sense at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kbxyd (talk • contribs) 18:44, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Charts
Please alter it like that: "Following XXXTentacion's death, 17 returned to the high spots of the worldwide charts, including No. 3 in New Zealand, No. 4 in the Netherlands and No. 7 on the Billboard 200 (55,000 units)[64]."

The US source is the one already used in the old phrase, the Durch source is here and the NZ source is here.

--2A02:B98:473F:3374:B86B:174C:3857:2B8B (talk) 12:47, 29 June 2018 (UTC)


 * Article's no longer protected. Fish +Karate 08:53, 3 July 2018 (UTC)