Talk:1824 United States presidential election in Missouri/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: PizzaKing13 (talk · contribs) 01:49, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

I'll review this article. PizzaKing13  ¡Hablame!  01:49, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Infobox

 * Looks good

Lead

 * MOS:POSS isn't definitive but consider changing "Adams's" to "Adams'"
 * I'm never entirely sure which way is correct. Have made the change

Background

 * Adams having a "cold and distant personality" sounds a bit subjective. Is there someone who described him as that?
 * It's a mixture of Ratcliffe's summary and Adams's self-description, for neutrality reasons I've just quoted and attributed Ratcliffe here.

The election

 * Lowercase "Federalism" in the 5th paragraph
 * Corrected

Aftermath

 * Pipe "Frederick Bates (politician)" to "Frederick Bates"
 * Oops, fixed

Results

 * Would it be possible to slightly increase the width of the "Party" column of the table so that the bolded instance of Democratic-Republican doesn't wrap to a second line.
 * I'm not sure. The table is fine on my desktop screen, but wraps over on mobile.  From past experience, there often isn't a way to get this to work on all layouts all of the time. Hog Farm Talk 02:29, 8 May 2023 (UTC)

Images

 * Images have appropriate licenses

Overall

 * Stable
 * Neutral POV
 * Sufficient coverage
 * Stays focused

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

(Criteria marked are unassessed)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
 * b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a. (reference section):
 * b. (citations to reliable sources):
 * c. (OR):
 * d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Pass/fail:

I've done my review of the article and left some comments. PizzaKing13  ¡Hablame!  02:16, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * - thanks for the review! I can ask at WP:VPT about the table width issue if you'd like.  As a heads-up, I'm going to be quite busy with work next week so any further comments I might be slow in addressing. Hog Farm Talk 02:29, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
 * The rest of the article looks good and the table alone isn't a make or break for GA status so I'll pass the review. Good job on expanding this article! PizzaKing13   ¡Hablame!  02:35, 8 May 2023 (UTC)