Talk:1859 in the United Kingdom

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 1859 in the United Kingdom. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070817165102/http://www.icons.org.uk/theicons/icons-timeline/1840-1860 to http://www.icons.org.uk/theicons/icons-timeline/1840-1860

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 10:29, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Citation needed
per WP:DOYCITE and WP:V, please provide a citation for the assertion you have added. Since 2017, we have required year-based and date-based articles to conform with the verifiability policy. It is a simple thing. The article has a source, copy it into this article. Elizium23 (talk) 13:44, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * On second thought, I have located a citation, which required some work, because no citation was in the source article at all so I don't want to hear from people that Wikipedia articles are a reliable source for WP:DOYCITE compliance. Elizium23 (talk) 13:50, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * WP:DOYCITE applies to Days of the Year articles. This is not a Days of the Year article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Camboxer (talk • contribs) 07:03, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
 * Oh, excuse me then! Please go on to violate WP:V anywhere but days of the year articles! But pleased to read Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Days of the year/Archive 13 and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Years. I will continue to request citations and I will continue to find out where editors like you are playing with unverified information. Elizium23 (talk) 14:15, 14 February 2021 (UTC)