Talk:1882 Navy Midshipmen football team/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Dom497 (talk · contribs) 02:04, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * No pictures in article.
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * No pictures in article.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass!-- Dom497 ( talk ) 13:01, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * No pictures in article.
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * No pictures in article.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass!-- Dom497 ( talk ) 13:01, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Pass!-- Dom497 ( talk ) 13:01, 20 June 2013 (UTC)

Comments

 * "However, even with the expansion, Princeton dominated the game, being declared the champion eight times in ten years." - Does ref 2 support this? Because the ref can't be accessed from a readers point of view, if ref 2 does indeed support this, place another footnote at the end of this sentence.-- Dom497 ( talk ) 02:15, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Footnotes added after the sentence. It is now backed up by refs 2 and 3.


 * For the table, call me stupid but I think some readers may not understand why the "Attendance" section is blank. Maybe add a note like you did for the location saying that the figure is not known?-- Dom497 ( talk ) 02:15, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Endnote added.

That's all....great work! I will pass the article once these two points are addressed.-- Dom497 ( talk ) 02:15, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * I've addressed your two concerns. Thanks for the review. - Awardgive. Help out with Project Fillmore County 05:02, 20 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Good work; all comments addressed.-- Dom497 ( talk ) 13:01, 20 June 2013 (UTC)