Talk:1907 in New Zealand

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 1907 in New Zealand. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081014052518/http://poisonpawn.co.nz/nzcftitles.htm to http://www.poisonpawn.co.nz/nzcftitles.htm
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090617211531/http://www.hrnz.co.nz/data/major_races/major_race2.htm to http://www.hrnz.co.nz/data/major_races/major_race2.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 14:45, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

CI--Mills
Not to be personal or hostile but do you bother to read the record when editing? I am criticised for doing something and then criticised for not doing something. Did you bother to read the record on Mills before coming forth with the bright idea about providing cn for what is claimed? I never claimed what was published, i simply made it less zeno-centric. Coming from an anthropological background if i were indig. it would be rather insulting what statement preceded the edit especially when there are examples of people passing until something become the flavor of the week.It is a contradiction of terms to call WP the new next best thing in information distribution yet have senior WP editors publicly publish that WP is not an environment of innovation and let stand what are zeno-centric statements. I do not know you and in all likelihood i will never have occasion to meet you but i do hope that what is suppose to be an innovative format believes that innovation in other ways needs to be considered otherwise you have the same old crap in a format that much of the world does not have a ready reliable source to retrieve it or power it.2605:E000:9149:A600:7D56:CC3:EA51:5FBF (talk) 21:42, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
 * The haste that the revert etc have been done shows that due diligence is lacking.2605:E000:9149:A600:7D56:CC3:EA51:5FBF (talk) 21:52, 4 August 2018 (UTC)