Talk:1910–11 North Carolina Tar Heels men's basketball team/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: G. Moore (talk · contribs) 15:22, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

NC Project Perspective
This article has good referencing and footnotes. It is well written and contains an appropriate use of tables and images. From a NC Project perspective, I would call it good. Other projects may also want to look at this article. User:G._Moore talk  15:22, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Thank you for taking the time to look at this article. Based on your comments, I'm a little confused - was that the entirety of the review? Or are you going to request a second opinion before declaring it "Good" or that it requires some changes before promotion? Just trying to figure out what to expect. My question also goes for the Dean Smith Center article for which you made similar comments. Best, 05:19, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * If you know of someone with some more substantive knowledge, it would be good to have them look at it for a second opinion. As far as I am concerned, it is GA.  Same for the Dean Smith article. User:G._Moore 13:21, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Oh I understand you now, I will keep my eyes peeled for someone editing the UNC basketball pages and seek out their opinion. However, I doubt people know much in particular about these years as there is very little written about the initial years and Newspapers.com even lacked editions of The Tar Heel, while other NC newspapers didn't cover the Heels on those missing days. Thanks again. Disc Wheel  ( T  +  C ) 16:37, 11 December 2019 (UTC)