Talk:1922–23 Nelson F.C. season/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Miyagawa   (talk)  12:25, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

I will be the reviewer for this article. I'll begin a read through now and add notes from any issues raised as I come across them. Miyagawa  (talk)  12:25, 17 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Might it be worthwhile adding the team's colours to the infobox? I note they're on the previous season's infobox and although the team photo is in black and white I doubt that the strip significantly changed as teams back then didn't tend to change their colours that much (really even in the modern game it's only the second and third strips that change at all). Miyagawa   (talk)  12:33, 17 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Added. Big  Dom  12:37, 17 April 2010 (UTC)


 * Added a cat I thought was missing. Miyagawa   (talk)  12:38, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

Can't find any other issues, so time for the review template....


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Overall, a very fine piece of work and an interesting article. Miyagawa  (talk)  12:40, 17 April 2010 (UTC)