Talk:1931 Dogger Bank earthquake

Untitled
Should references to the 27th Feb 2008 earthquake even be on this page?? It has its own page now. 80.168.225.145 (talk) 11:30, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Location
I've put in a very crude location, can anyone refine the coord tag to more than half-degree accuracy? 82.20.52.30 (talk) 23:53, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


 * http://www.stvincent.ac.uk/Resources/EarthSci/Earth/records.html
 * In 1931 Dogger Bank earthquake on 2011-05-25 03:02:04, 404 Not Found
 * In 1931 Dogger Bank earthquake on 2011-06-04 15:38:21, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 15:38, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on 1931 Dogger Bank earthquake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://archive.is/20130505055244/http://www.tgomagazine.co.uk/news/outdoornews/Earthquake-hits-the-Lake-District to http://www.tgomagazine.co.uk/news/outdoornews/Earthquake-hits-the-Lake-District
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080224134254/http://www.stvincent.ac.uk/Resources/EarthSci/Earth/records.html to http://www.stvincent.ac.uk/Resources/EarthSci/Earth/records.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:33, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

Casualty numbers and categories
The infobox under "Casualties" it states "2 (indirect)" The article only mentions that a "a Hull woman died as a result of a heart attack", so is there a source for a second casualty? The article does say that "the head of the waxwork of Dr Crippen at Madame Tussauds" in London fell off as a result of the earthquake, but surely this is not being counted as a casualty! In a related point I also note the article is included in Category:1931 disasters in the United Kingdom in the United Kingdom, but I wonder if one death means that this can be labelled a disaster? As a result of a recent discussion at Talk:1906 Swansea earthquake, the 1906 Swansea earthquake article was removed from Category:1906 disasters in the United Kingdom, although in that case there was no loss of life, only a couple of injuries and the earthquake was less powerful. Dunarc (talk) 23:46, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
 * I see that the article has been removed from the former Category:1931 disasters in the United Kingdom, which I think is the correct decision. Dunarc (talk) 21:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC)