Talk:1940 in rail transport

Tenses
User Devoxo has changed past tenses to the present (some present tense was already in the list of events), saying that by that change the tenses are corrected. Is there a Wikipedia paradigm showing whether using a present tense for past events is encouraged? I have no axe to grind but find the effect to be somewhat dramatic.--SilasW 15:48, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


 * http://www.urbanrail.net/am/nark/newark.htm
 * In 1940 in rail transport on 2011-05-25 03:15:32, 404 Not Found
 * In 1940 in rail transport on 2011-06-04 16:12:20, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 16:12, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 1940 in rail transport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5tCrrKxuu?url=http://www.jernbaneverket.no/no/dokumenter/Om-oss/Jernbanestatistikk/Jernbanestatistikk-2008/ to http://www.jernbaneverket.no/no/dokumenter/Om-oss/Jernbanestatistikk/Jernbanestatistikk-2008/
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.flamsbana-museet.no/visartikkel.asp?art=296
 * Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.geocities.com/bevshul/OHS/articles/Storey1877.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 23:28, 14 June 2017 (UTC)