Talk:1947 BSAA Avro Lancastrian Star Dust accident/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: N419BH 20:27, 28 September 2011 (UTC)

I will review.

Checklist
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * First sentence of the second paragraph of the "STENDEC" section needs a cite. ✅
 * C. No original research:
 * See above
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * Are there any available images of the crash site? Adding such would be exceedingly helpful.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * This article now passes the GA criteria. I do hope additional improvements continue to be made.
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * Are there any available images of the crash site? Adding such would be exceedingly helpful.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * This article now passes the GA criteria. I do hope additional improvements continue to be made.
 * This article now passes the GA criteria. I do hope additional improvements continue to be made.