Talk:1948 Tinker Air Force Base tornadoes/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Reaper Eternal (talk · contribs) 16:08, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Alright! I'll be reviewing this over the next couple days, performing minor copyedits and tweaks as I go along. When I'm done, I'll get back to you with my review. Good luck! Reaper Eternal (talk) 16:08, 23 August 2012 (UTC)


 * Just out of curiosity, it has been almost a month since any activity in the review, so what is the state of it? Thanks and happy editing :)  TheSpecialUser TSU 14:53, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 * It's called I forgot to add it to my list of things to do. o_0 Sorry about that&mdash;I'll get to it today! Next time, feel free to drop a notification on my talk page after around one week, because I mentioned several days. Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:41, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Alright! Here's my review! Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:32, 21 September 2012 (UTC)


 * Lead section
 * You give the time for the first tornado in the body, but the time field in the infobox is empty. It should probably be added here.
 * I feel it would be a bit confusing to have a time in the infobox, since the article is about two different tornadoes which struck on different days at different times.- Running On Brains (talk) 15:23, 4 October 2012 (UTC)


 * March 20 tornado
 * Great work!


 * Investigation and tornado forecast
 * Nothing seems amiss here.


 * March 25th tornado
 * Is there a time for this tornado available in reliable sources that you could add both here and in the infobox?
 * ✅, though see my other comment about the infobox. - Running On Brains (talk) 15:23, 4 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Legacy
 * The term "was a rousing success" just seems to be a slight NPOV issue. Is there another wording you could think of?
 * ✅- Running On Brains (talk) 15:23, 4 October 2012 (UTC)


 * See also
 * You could possibly add to prevent the wrapping of the   line.
 * ✅- Running On Brains (talk) 15:23, 4 October 2012 (UTC)


 * References
 * The accessdate for reference #5 is inconsistent with the others.
 * All references look great apart from the minor formatting inconsistency!
 * ✅- Running On Brains (talk) 15:23, 4 October 2012 (UTC)


 * External links
 * I'm not certain what purpose this link serves. Furthermore, I cannot see the reason for appending The Tornado to the link. Could you explain?
 * Converted to a reference- Running On Brains (talk) 15:23, 4 October 2012 (UTC)


 * Overall
 * This is a very excellently done article, and I will have no problems passing it. Great work! Reaper Eternal (talk) 13:32, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry I took so long to respond, I have been a bit lax on my Wikiing recently. Let me know if you have any more concerns! - Running On Brains (talk) 15:23, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
 * It's no problem! I forgot to start the review for a month too....
 * I've checked over the changes and they all seem good, so I'm going to pass this article now. I made a minor change to the template to hide the "time" parameter when not supplied. Thanks for your work! Reaper Eternal (talk) 15:53, 4 October 2012 (UTC)