Talk:1955 Pacific hurricane season

1969 Pacific hurricane season
I found a PDF document in the old NOAA library (MWR, though still explicitly linked as NOAA Archives) involving the subject matter. It contains info on all storms (including pictures). A similar PDF exists for 1968. My question is should we:


 * Split 1968-1969 off the main article (1950-1969) and place them into separate pages;


 * Keep the entries for both seasons on this page, but make main articles to both, or


 * Not make an article and leave the entries on this page as is.

(PS. If an article for 1969 is allowed by either options A or B, can I adopt the article for the portal if the option still exists?)

Jake52 My talk 21:01, 1 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Really in my opinion what we need to do with this article is split it in two


 * Article 1 would contain Pre 1960 Hurricanes which were not named
 * Article 2 would contain Post 1960 Hurricanes which were named. Jason Rees 02:19, 16 September 2006 (BST)

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


 * http://www.prh.noaa.gov/cphc/pages/hurrclimate.php
 * In 1951–1964 Pacific hurricane seasons on 2011-05-25 03:28:11, 404 Not Found
 * In 1951–1964 Pacific hurricane seasons on 2011-06-04 17:39:58, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 17:40, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Dead link 2
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


 * http://www.wrh.noaa.gov/sgx/research/Guide/weatherhistory.pdf
 * In 1939 California tropical storm on 2011-05-25 03:13:36, 404 Not Found
 * In 1987 Pacific hurricane season on 2011-05-25 05:39:55, 404 Not Found
 * In 1939 California tropical storm on 2011-06-04 16:00:08, 404 Not Found
 * In 1951–1964 Pacific hurricane seasons on 2011-06-04 17:40:09, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 17:40, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Naming lists
Do we have any source that their were two lists of names in the early 60s? - I have been contacted by a very reliable contact who thinks that 4 sets of names were originally drafted in 1960 to cover the EPAC, instead of just 2. Have we got any proof either way? Jason Rees (talk) 00:25, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Right now the naming list is simply based off what names were actually used. If you have a better source, that would be ideal, although once these seasons are split up (as I believe is the plan), it wouldn't work as well. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 01:57, 27 July 2011 (UTC)