Talk:1960 Valdivia earthquake/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: LunaEatsTuna (talk · contribs) 00:40, 1 May 2023 (UTC)


 * Looks interesting! I will get to this within seven days. Please note that I am returning to GA reviewing after an hiatus, so please WP:TROUT me if I make a mistake. Thanks,  ツ LunaEatsTuna  (💬)— 00:40, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

Copyvio
Earwig Copyvio Detector says this is good to go.

Files
TBD

Prose
TBD

Failed "good article" nomination
This article has failed its Good article nomination. This is how the article, as of June 27, 2023, compares against the six good article criteria:


 * 1. Well written?:
 * 2. Verifiable?:
 * 3. Broad in coverage?:
 * 4. Neutral point of view?:
 * 5. Stable?:
 * 6. Images?:

I hate doing this, but it's been awhile and there has been no reply to any of my comments. No hard feelings, but this GA nomination cannot proceed. If the issues noted above were addressed by the nominating editor or somebody else and the article were renominated for GA, I would be glad to review it again.

When these issues are addressed, the article can be renominated. If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to have it reassessed. Thank you for your work so far.— CurryTime7-24 (talk) 21:14, 27 June 2023 (UTC)