Talk:1960 Writers Guild of America strike

Cut to stub-basics
Hi, I came across this article in Recent Changes, where an IP editor had completely reversed the meaning of the text. On looking further, I realised that the previous editor had also changed the meaning drastically, so in three successive versions we had three wildly different sets of facts. The article also had no sources whatsoever, and on Google, the majority of hits about the subject were this article or mirrors of it, raising the risk of circular-referencing supporting contradictory accounts. It had been templated as lacking citations. I have therefore reduced it to a one-sentence stub, adding one source (which isn't great because it's not really independent of the subject, though I have no reason to doubt its accuracy). I would invite other editors to enlarge the text to make this article what it should be, but please don't just revert/add unsubstantiated facts. Facts must be supported in some way. Elemimele (talk) 16:34, 6 May 2023 (UTC)