Talk:1982 World Snooker Championship/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Tayi Arajakate (talk · contribs) 14:37, 17 October 2020 (UTC)

Meta-discussion

 * Hello Lee Vilenski and BennyOnTheLoose, I'll be the one to review this nomination. Will be post further comments within the next few days. Tayi Arajakate  Talk 14:37, 17 October 2020 (UTC)
 * and, pinging, as I have completed the review and it appears to be meet the criteria of good article on nomination. One minor issue was spotted which is listed in the comments below. Tayi Arajakate  Talk 15:07, 24 October 2020 (UTC)

Assessment
 Comprehension: The comprehension of the article is good.

Verifiability: The article is verifiable.

Comprehensiveness: The article is broad and focus in its coverage.

Neutrality: The article is complaint with the policy on neutral point of view.

Stability: The article is stable. Illustration: The article is well illustrated with appropriate images and other graphical features.

 Current status:

Comments

 * One minor issue was spotted, the main draw and qualifying use different abbreviations for South Africa. Looking at other articles on World Snooker Championship, the abbreviation of RSA seems to be the appropriate one. Tayi Arajakate  Talk 15:04, 24 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Thanks, . I've changed the "SAF" abbreviations to "RSA" as suggested. Regards, BennyOnTheLoose (talk) 21:38, 24 October 2020 (UTC)