Talk:1985 World Snooker Championship final

25th Anniversary frame
This is like saying there should be no mention of New Year in the Auld Lang Syne article, because the article is not about New Year. The anniversary frame is wholly to do with the 1985 final. It has much more relevance here than it has in the 2010 World Snooker Championship article. You'll be glad to know that I can find nothing on the 20th Anniversary, so will not be adding it to the article. Mannafredo (talk) 15:17, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

This has been a great effort - well done. I've tightened up the text a little to improve the English and remove an American term 'pocketed'. I notice that Ted Lowe's quote about Taylor 'chancing his arm' pn the final black has been removed, however. I trust my edit has been useful.Regards, Billsmith60 (talk) 21:46, 17 December 2021 (UTC)

Question
Has someone just pasted that 'road to the final' from a Champions League page? Heh —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.27.233.231 (talk) 11:44, 2 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I was. Don't like it? Armbrust  Talk to me  Contribs  15:34, 2 May 2011 (UTC)

Something wrong here
"Taylor then won six of the seven frames to trail only 7–9 overnight..........Going into the final session, he won two of the first three frames to trail 8–11"

If he'd won two of the first three it would've been 9-10 surely? I can't find a record of the exact order of frames won from the sources given. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.25.86.138 (talk) 18:09, 12 February 2013‎
 * Armbrust The Homunculus 18:50, 12 February 2013 (UTC)

"Taylor was never ahead" - not completely true
The claim that "Until the final frame, Taylor was never ahead" is not completely true. After the 15–15, Taylor went on to lead in frame 31 with 6–0, before finally losing the frame with 6–66. This can be seen in this recording, 10:43:08. So, for a short time and a tiny edge, he was ahead of Davis, even before the final frame. The wording should be corrected in this regard. --KnightMove (talk) 06:02, 29 April 2021 (UTC)
 * I have solved it myself by adding "... ahead in frames." --KnightMove (talk) 15:01, 2 May 2021 (UTC)