Talk:1988–89 Arsenal F.C. season/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:54, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

I'll take a look. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:54, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Not a fan of one-sentence paras in lead. try and meld somewhere....
 * Added something on players winning awards in the lead and the squad stats section.


 * Arsenal sold a number of fringe players throughout the season so Graham could trim his squad. - err, surely the players were sold (thereby trimming the squad) so he could expand the squad with new players....?


 * The flow through the months is okay, but there is a little bit of "and then (match)....and then (match)...and then (match)." I wonder if a little more fleshing out here would be good. e.g. the dustup that earnt Davis a 9 match suspension. Anything else about any particular match or in-form or out-of-form players/goals etc.
 * I've fleshed out what I feel are the interesting/notable games that season, let me know if you think more is needed. I only have access to few publications atm, so can't expand as much as I'd like to. Lemonade51 (talk) 16:36, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Otherwise looking pretty "Good"..... Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 01:00, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your comments, have replied to some of your comments above. :) Lemonade51 (talk) 16:36, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * That looks fine - it gives it some atmosphere and works well.

NB: Earwigs copyvio is clear. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:09, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

1. Well written?:
 * Prose quality:
 * Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:
 * References to sources:
 * Citations to reliable sources, where required:
 * No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:
 * Major aspects:
 * Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:
 * Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?
 * No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:
 * Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: - as noted above. comprehensive and engaging read Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 05:09, 18 October 2017 (UTC)