Talk:1989–1999 (album)

Requested move

 * The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: consensus to move the page, per the discussion below. Dekimasu よ! 07:44, 1 December 2014 (UTC)

1989–1999 → 1989–1999 (album) – WP:CRITERIA. In ictu oculi (talk) 03:18, 20 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Yes but please use en dash, and a redirect from the hyphen version. Dicklyon (talk) 05:44, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Support per nom -- 67.70.35.44 (talk) 06:11, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Support as per similar requests with date ranges as article titles. Zarcadia (talk) 12:39, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Support, per the outcome of recent discussion at WP:AT (and various other places): that titles consisting only of date ranges merit clarification. ╠╣uw [ talk ]  15:45, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Support per nom and ╠╣uw. "1989–1999" is too ambiguous. Even someone familiar with the topic would be highly unlikely to refer to that topic name without some other text nearby to clarify the meaning. To the average reader, the expectation would be that an article about "1989–1999" would be a discussion of a span of time, not an album. —BarrelProof (talk) 20:57, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Support as per everyone else's reasons; the current name is just confusing. --V2Blast (talk) 09:16, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Support: It makes since to have "Album" in parentheses because some people could get confused with the period 1989-1999. -- CookieMonster755  (talk) 07:05, 28 November 2014 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.