Talk:1992 April subtropical storm

Good work
Good work. GA it if you can. Mit ch contribs 11:08, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

GA Review
Just to get it overwith. Everything is passable, but I'm just gonna fix an error in one of the external links. good job hinkman. Mit ch contribs 15:55, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Good article on the little information there must have been on this storm! I wish i had the ability to write article as good as the rest of you WPTC members. -- Jul  ian  colton 

GA Sweeps Review: Pass
As part of the WikiProject Good Articles, we're doing sweeps to go over all of the current GAs and see if they still meet the GA criteria. I'm specifically going over all of the "Meteorology and atmospheric sciences" articles. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. I have made several minor corrections throughout the article. Altogether the article is well-written and is still in great shape after its passing in 2007. Continue to improve the article making sure all new information is properly sourced and neutral. It would also be beneficial to go through the article and update all of the access dates of the inline citations and fix any dead links. If you have any questions, let me know on my talk page and I'll get back to you as soon as I can. I have updated the article history to reflect this review. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 20:54, 25 May 2008 (UTC)

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


 * http://ams.allenpress.com/archive/1520-0493/122/3/pdf/i1520-0493-122-3-517.pdf
 * In 1992 April subtropical storm on 2011-05-25 05:58:59, 404 Not Found
 * In 1992 April subtropical storm on 2011-06-24 19:31:13, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 19:31, 24 June 2011 (UTC)

Merge?
Although I made this, I'm second-guessing its notability, especially since the List of off-season Atlantic hurricanes has become a much better article on handling generic off-season storms. There was no impact, and I think it could easily be merged. Any thoughts? --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 18:26, 11 January 2013 (UTC)
 * You are right. I think since there is little content and the author himself no longer supports keeping it, we should merge this article.--12george1 (talk) 04:28, 25 February 2013 (UTC)