Talk:1994–95 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 16:25, 24 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello User:Hurricanehink! I am going to be reviewing this article. Hopefully I should be done by later today. Nice work on this article, btw.--12george1 (talk) 16:25, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
 * " from October through April. It was much less damaging than its predecessor, " - What was less damaging than its predecessor? September? :P
 * The season. I think that's pretty clear that [season] is the antecedent. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 17:38, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Ok. I will let that slide.--12george1 (talk) 18:08, 24 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Why is Heida not mentioned in the lead? Every other storm is.
 * Added. --♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 17:38, 24 May 2014 (UTC)


 * "The Joint Typhoon Warning Center also issued warnings" - Make sure you include the abbreviation of the Joint Typhoon Warning Center.
 * Ah, good point. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 17:38, 24 May 2014 (UTC)


 * "The Intertropical Convergence Zone (ITCZ) became active toward the end of November" - So why in the lead is "Intertropical Convergence Zone" in lowercase, but uppercase here?
 * No reason. I changed it. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 17:38, 24 May 2014 (UTC)


 * "faster due to increasing wind shear." - Wikilink wind shear
 * K. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 17:38, 24 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Whoa, Christelle's section is large. It could almost be split into three paragraphs. Would it be possible to cut the section a bit? Even Albertine and Marlene are shorter. I think it's probably because Bentha is mentioned so much.
 * Well, the MH was very complicated, and it lasted two weeks. I split it into three. ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 17:38, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Well, I did want the section cut, but it does look much better as three paragraphs. So I am satisfied.--12george1 (talk) 18:08, 24 May 2014 (UTC)


 * "After Lidy, there was one final nondeveloping disturbance" - Apparently "nondeveloping" isn't a word. Maybe hyphenate it? I.e. non-developing.
 * Added hyphen! ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 17:38, 24 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Well, I have no other issues with this article. Again, nice work!--12george1 (talk) 16:25, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks so much :) ♫ Hurricanehink ( talk ) 17:38, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
 * And thanks for your quick response! I am satisfied with the conditions of this article and will now list it as a Good Article. Regards,--12george1 (talk) 18:08, 24 May 2014 (UTC)