Talk:1995 Football League Cup final/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 16:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

I'll review this asap. Zwerg Nase (talk) 16:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

A solid article on the Football League Cup final 20 years ago. Some things left to sort out:
 * Lead: two times you write about "matches" that we "close affairs", which reads pretty repetitive.
 * Route to the final: For the Bolton part: You should place the citation at the end of every paragraph. Also, maybe you have sources here for the specific games?
 * Route to the final: On my widescreen monitor, the two result tables intersect, leaving a lot of whitespace. You should probably move them both at the end of the section, next to each other. Even better would be if you could convert it into a table such as shown here, that would also give the opportunity to make the prose shorter. But that's optional.
 * First half: You should choose a more neutral term that "dominance".
 * Details: Any chance to get a source for the match rules?
 * Post match: There needs to be a source for the fact that Liverpool qualified for European competition by winning the Cup.
 * Optional: You might want to include how Liverpool performed in the European competition the following season.

Good job so far! On hold. Zwerg Nase (talk) 19:23, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Since the nominator seems to be on vacation, I was bold and made the changes myself. Zwerg Nase (talk) 14:23, 29 October 2015 (UTC)