Talk:1998 Comfrey–St. Peter tornado outbreak/GA1

GA Review
This review is transcluded from Talk:1998 Comfrey – St. Peter tornado outbreak/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.


 * GA review (see here for criteria)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * WP:MOSNUM requires hard (non-breaking) spaces between numbers and their units. e.g. 150 km/h (click "edit" to see the symbol that makes a hard space). GA reviews don't mind this, but FAC ones certainly do.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * We talked about the image licenses and I am confident that they will be sorted out
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 *  Plasticup  T / C  19:42, 18 July 2008 (UTC)
 * We talked about the image licenses and I am confident that they will be sorted out
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 *  Plasticup  T / C  19:42, 18 July 2008 (UTC)