Talk:19th SAARC summit

Bias
This is probably the most biased article I recent memory. All your sources are from Indian newspapers. If Sri Lanka has indeed withdrawn, find a Sri Lankan newspaper or government official which has officially stated it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.189.108.242 (talk) 07:51, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Barthateslisa threatening to block me for removing Indian POV
I have added information regarding Sri Lanka, Maldives and Nepal's position on the summit. Barthateslisa without any reason reverted my edits claiming I was involving myself in an "edit war". I'm sorry, but the current version which I updated it more neutral than the version he keeps reverting to. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.189.108.242 (talk) 08:36, 1 October 2016 (UTC)

Nepal, Maldives and Sri Lanka have not boycotted the summit
I have been trying to post this in the article, but the article is being continuously vandalized by Indian wikipedia members who refuse to accept reality. Kindly keep your nationalistic nonsense at home. I have provided the article with neutral sources. Why are my edits being reverted back to an Indian POV?

Pakistan's postponed stand (posted according to Article X, SAARC charter) http://www.voanews.com/a/pakistan-says-saarc-summit-postponed/3532330.html

Nepal's stand (not boycotting) http://www.voanews.com/a/nepal-urges-conducive-enviroment-for-south-asian-summit/3530444.html

Maldives stand (not boycotting) http://www.hindustantimes.com/world-news/the-maldives-calls-for-an-early-date-of-saarc-summit-asks-members-to-convene/story-fdDQQ2E5IxUbauaJUoiLlI.html

Sri Lanka's stand (withdrew according to Article X, SAARC charter) http://www.dailynews.lk/?q=2016/09/30/local/94570

Next time READ before you revert articles. These are NEUTRAL sources, unlike the nonsense Indian biased news sources the editors keep reverting back to. How is this logical? Indians come across as very immature when it comes to anything related to Pakistan. It's almost like they're so over-exicted that superpowers Afghanistan and Bangladesh have boycotted Pakistan while poor countries like China, Russia and Iran are backing it. You Indians need to wake up from your slumber. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 182.189.108.242 (talk) 08:38, 1 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Just how ridiculous are you? You claim that Indian news sources are biased, but you yourself cite an Indian paper (Hindustan Times). And why are you citing United States government-funded VoA? Aren't they the "Great Satan" ? Apparently, everyone is neutral when they say what you want them to say, otherwise they are biased. Your comments here are a joke and clearly reflect your lack of maturity. Speaking of slumber, India has individual states that have a larger GDP than the whole of Pakistan. If you Pakistanis stopped worrying about India and focused on your own nation, the entire history of the last few decades would have been much better for everyone.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.218.130.121 (talk) 15:16, 28 May 2017 (UTC)


 * I support your stand in the cases of Nepal,Pakistan and Maldives.(I have even incorporated the info about Maldives and the response by Pakistan from your edits.)But your perception about Sri-lanka is probably wrong.Please reread the very article, you yourself cited,about it,without going into a meaningless edit war and kindly approach for consensus!!!Thank you!!!! Aru@baska ❯❯❯  Vanguard 15:17, 1 October 2016 (UTC)