Talk:1: Nenokkadine

Semi-protected edit request on 5 January 2014
plz let me edit their is wrong information provided

115.240.120.224 (talk) 16:00, 5 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: It is not possible for individual users to be granted permission to edit a semi-protected article. You can do one of the following:
 * You will be able to edit this article without restriction four days after account registration if you make at least 10 constructive edits to other articles.
 * You can request the article be unprotected at this page. To do this, you need to provide a valid rationale that refutes the original reason for protection.
 * You can provide a specific request to edit the article in "change X to Y" format on this talk page and an editor who is not blocked from editing the article will determine if the requested edit is appropriate. -- El Hef  ( Meep? ) 03:39, 6 January 2014 (UTC)

Film Review Link Updated
49.205.61.82 (talk) 11:55, 11 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Pictogram voting question.svg Question: I don't understand your request. That link is already in the article and works correctly. Please clarify. -- El Hef  ( Meep? ) 14:43, 11 January 2014 (UTC)

box office
1st day collections in AP were reported to be around 11.4cr (share).2nd day collections were around 10cr ap share.3rd day around 9 cr AP(share). Total first weekend ap share was around 30cr Vishwanath3939 (talk) 11:05, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 * ❌ the box-office sources are very unreliable and hence won't be added to the article. Thanks,  ƬheStrike   Σagle  sorties  11:10, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Video game - section blanking
With reference to this revert, your edit summary tells "not a reliable source". The contents in the section cites http://www.123telugu.com. Either the issue could be brought to talk page or the creator/major contributor of the article or if this isn't a reliable source, it may be discussed at WP:RSN. Else could have been added to that section. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 04:56, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * while "ref improve" could be used, removal of improperly sourced materials is also an equally valid option. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  11:21, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Yes, it could be used. "Ref improve" could have been used and after a certain period of time, if no improvement is seen it could be blanked notifying the creator/major contributor. First you mentioned "not a reliable source" and now "improperly sourced", could you differentiate or educate me on that?
 * no practical difference - it fails to meet the criteria as outlined in WP:RS. it is not as if the person wishing to re-insert the content is unaware of the issues with the sourcing that they need to meet before restoring challenged content. --  TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  18:33, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

reviews- only professional review sites
We only include reviews from professional review sites, and we do not even need to include every "professional" review that we may find. The bloat with non professional reviews needs to be and stay trimmed. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom  13:38, 14 March 2014 (UTC)


 * O.K. Nice, they are also Professional film news sources because Some times TOI source is using Gulte, Greatandhra as a Reference and 123T, IB and some other Sources also are needed because each Individual site will give their Own Review and Rating regarding any Film. So, we can found a lot of Difference between Reviews and Ratings from Individual sites. So, we can't say that it is Bloating (or) Repetition. So, you're Wrong. If you think that you are not Wrong then please Welcome the Editors you may Know. I am ready to discuss with them. Raghusri (talk) 11:00, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

"Share"
The bulk of the data in the box office section seems to revolve around distributor share, not gross. Why is that? Am I misinterpreting what "share" means? MOS:FILM focuses on gross and budget, not financial details about distributor shares. Any info would be appreciated before I start trimming. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:56, 10 September 2016 (UTC)

Cast
Looking back at the film, I notice that Gautham's name is presented before Kriti Sanon at the beginning credits so shouldn't his name be in front of hers in the article. SP013 (talk) 15:34, 10 August 2020 (UTC)
 * No way, that kid's role is a cameo which we typically mention at the end. (Hindu "His son Gautam makes a debut through a cameo..") --Ab207 (talk) 15:39, 10 August 2020 (UTC)